This person seeks all the parties to work together to find the best possible outcome. See what you think about this style of negotiating.
The collaborative negotiator believes that a negotiation is the resolution of a joint problem and, that by being open, honest and respectful, they can fulfil as many of everyone’s needs and want (tangible and emotional) as possible.
They seek to preserve and enhance the relationship between the parties, thus substantially improving the likelihood of its successful implementation. There should be ‘no regrets’ about the negotiation with the benefit of hindsight and therefore the path to negotiating in the future will be smoothed.
The goal: all parties win |
The collaborator will seek, in the event of there being no agreement, for everyone to be comfortable with that decision.
Collaborators will seek to work within the bounds of others’ cultures – but not necessarily without challenge if it contradicts their own.
For instance: Religions attach significance to different days of the week, which may restrict when business negotiations can and cannot be undertaken. A collaborator will respect this – but not at the expense of countering his/her own religious beliefs.
Emphasising their approach, they will use terms like ‘we’, ‘together’, ‘mutual benefit’, ‘how else can we resolve…’, or ‘what do you think?’ They use questions to discover exactly what is negotiable (and what is not).
Their voice will be calm, confident and deliberate without appearing contrived or unnatural.
Collaborators deliberately adopt a more complete set of body language techniques rather than the occasional and disjointed usage discussed in the previous styles.
On the upside, the maximum exchange of needs and wants takes place. A good working relationship is established and maintained for the future.
On the downside, this collaborative style perhaps needs more deliberate persistence and patience than the other styles of negotiation. This is especially true when faced with a view that successful negotiations require a winner and a loser.
Potentially, doubts may occur for even the strongest advocate of collaboration: ‘Had I been tougher, could I have achieved more?’ While it is unlikely that this is the case, it can inhibit their advocacy of this approach in the future.
There are lots of possibilities – here are a few: