Control is the act of reducing the difference between plan and reality.
Click here to view a video that explains the steps in the control process.
The control process comprises three operating modes:
Measuring: monitoring and determining progress by formal and informal reporting as well as observations
Evaluating: determining the cause of deviations from the project plan.
Correcting: taking corrective action in addressing the deviations.
A project control system should be used to facilitate the above-mentioned modes. A simple system that starts with a comparison of the actual results of work done with the desired results (the project plan).
Variances are identified; triggering a process whereby the possible causes are identified and evaluated. A number of solutions need to be generated and considered, after which the best solutions are implemented. The results of the corrections are then measured. These corrective actions need to be recorded – the project plan is updated to reflect the real status of the project. Progress is then reported.
The system can be depicted as follows:
Variances/deviations are not only identified through formal measurements, but also through keen observations by the project manager who keepings a close watch on everything.
Managing by walking around (MBWA) is a technique well known in management circles; in the case of project management we might as well call it Monitoring By Walking Around. Monitoring is collecting, recording and reporting information concerning any and all aspects of project performance that the project manager or others in the organization wish to know, and is part and parcel of the control process. What should be monitored and consequently controlled?
Booyens identified the following things to monitor:
Let us consider a few control topics important to the project manager:
Coping with changes and changing priorities have been reported as the most important single problem facing the project manager. Minor changes can be reacted to fairly quickly, but significant change is much more serious and can have a demotivating effect on the project team unless it is something, they have sought in the interests of the project. Change can stem from the customer, the end user, the sponsor or from technical problems. The most common changes are due to the natural tendency of the customer and team members to improve the product or service. The customer may become aware of new demands and performance requirements during the course of the project; new technologies may become available; or better ideas occur to the team as work progresses. Without control, a continuing accumulation of little changes can have a major negative effect on the project’s schedule and cost.
How should change then be controlled?
It is suggested that the use of a formal change control system be utilised:
When performance becomes a problem due to things such as insufficient resources when required or changes required by the customer in specifications, cost implications arise. When time becomes a problem due to things such as incorrect task sequencing or unavailable resources when required, cost implications arise.
Cost need to be controlled due to typical problems such as:
It should be obvious that changes/problems regarding performance and time will result in cost issues.
In order to control costs accurately, data must be collected in a consistent and disciplined way.
For effective control, the project manager needs information on:
Costs need to be measured as work progresses and then be compared with the operating budget (as derived from the WBS). If any variances are identified, corrective action is required to minimize the consequences.
Project evaluation appraises the progress and performance of a project compared to the project’s planned progress and performance. Project evaluation conducted in a formal way is called project auditing. The project audit is a thorough examination of the management of a project, its methodology and procedures, its records, its properties, its budgets and expenditures and its degree of completion. The focus of the audit may be the entire project or only a part of the project.
Meredith & Mantel make the following observations on a project audit:
Quality is of the essence for project management, as one of the forces in the triangle of forces of Time, Cost, and Quality. Quality also has a major influence in the costing of a project, not only concerning the material, delivery and equipment cost, but also the cost of quality as can be seen from the figure below.
It is therefore also essential to plan quality as part of the project planning cycle and to work the plan in the implementation, monitoring and control cycle of the project.
Click here to view a video that explains how to measure project success.