Employees can accept that which they seem to have been necessary for organisational survival, especially if it can be shown that management did all it could to avoid the negative consequences of change. But don’t forget the human touch. As one observer noted, you will often be presiding at something more appropriately viewed as a funeral than a business school class.
Do not count on the rumour mill to provide an accurate account! Knowing how those affected by the change are being assisted will not only help employees with feelings of guilt for having survived a disaster but also ease such worries as, How will they treat me?
Your “stars” need to be told that they are seen as such before they panic and run to the competition. Additionally, everyone needs to hear why they are essential to the reorganized operation and that you will be counting on them.
“Bad-mouth” these employees and you risk losing respect and trust. Explain the criteria in general, using such terms as longevity, function, contribution, etc. but make it clear that none of those leaving would have had to leave were it not necessary to reorganize or cut back on staffing levels.
If the future is uncertain, it is better to be “up-front” and say so, while explaining what steps the organization is taking to avoid additional upheavals. If you give assurances that prove to be false shortly, the resulting breakdown in the trust will take years to recover from. Rather encourage employees to assist in a strategy to cope with changes constructively on all levels, so that future changes might have a less negative impact on their well-being.
View this as a natural part of the grieving and healing process. As a leader or manager, be prepared for personal, verbal attacks. It may be a good idea to have an outside consultant or an expert from human resources meet with your group to facilitate the venting. Some experts recommend encouraging spontaneously created rituals among employees to symbolize the passing away of the old way of doing things.
Make it clear where the organization is headed now, in terms of mission and goals and how your unit fits into that overall picture. Introduce values, formerly held or newly adopted and what the organization aspires to represent? Clarify top management’s vision for the future.
Employees need assurance that the organisation itself will survive and upheavals tend to raise doubts that this is the first step toward closing the doors. Explain what other strategies and plans the organization can follow to fulfil its mission and to achieve future profitability, competitiveness and growth. Also, ask for their inputs, but only if you plan to use it.
For employees in the endings stage of transition, assume that much of what you communicate to reassure and reorient them will be lost due to feelings of upset or downright scepticism. Repetition is the key! Deliver the message in person, write memos, e-mail, post announcements, etc. One company also distributed videotapes. Another sent letters to employees’ homes after downsizing to ensure the message got through accurately to anxious family members. Consistency of message, together with continuous updates can be very reassuring to employees that the ship is not rudderless and that someone is at the wheel.
This goes hand-in-glove with the previous suggestion. Everyone needs to hear the same message as a team; followed by an individual message in which you affirm that person’s value and hear his or her concerns and feelings.
Successfully helping employees cope with significant change, as you can tell by now, can be an immense challenge! You will need to draw upon all your leadership experience and skills, knowledge, gut feelings, stamina and common sense, not to mention the necessity of continuous learning as you go along!
After the organizational change has taken place and the dust has settled, there is still a serious adjustment problem for the employees. Organisations can quickly implement change. Employees usually adjust more slowly to the change. During the Neutral Zone, the employees are gradually adjusting to the organisation’s change and leaders must take specific action to assist the employees in moving toward acceptance.
Staff are often expected to do more with less. Front-line employees can often figure out better than anyone else how to reduce inefficiencies, errors, waste, roadblocks and unnecessary red tape, while increasing quality and client or customer satisfaction. Try to use their creativity and insights, both to achieve management goals and to help employees feel needed!
Don’t underestimate the sense of upheaval and confusion employees may experience when many of the old ways of functioning, which provided their sense of organizational identity, are suddenly “reinvented”. If their new roles are yet to be worked out, say so and tell them how and when this will be done. The unknown is one of the greatest sources of fear.
This is a part of organizational renewal or transformation. Think about this from the customer’s or client’s point of view. What could be done to make things go faster, smoother and more hassle-free for those people the organization exists to serve? What temporary policies and procedures might be appropriate until the dust settles? Get all your staff involved in generating the answers!
Another tremendous source of fear is doubt about whether one can succeed in the new roles and responsibilities.
In most organizations, this will be no problem. But in the middle of a change, if certain procedures, products or services are being discontinued, some employees may experience a temporarily lightened workload. Far from being a welcome relief, this can be excruciating to employees who are already insecure about their jobs. Plan projects and provide training but keep them productive!
To help employees move through the stages of Transition to Beginnings and beyond, we need to appeal to the rational, practical part of their minds which can plan, solve problems, see opportunities, etc. But strong emotions form a kind of wall surrounding the rational part of a person and getting through often requires that we facilitate their letting go of these emotions.
Instead of imagining a brick or stone wall, think of a huge, circular, inflatable wall, too high to see over and too slippery to climb. The air which inflates it, is, of course, emotion. To get over this wall, the air needs to be let out carefully. If it builds up with no release of pressure, there is the risk of an explosion. On the other hand, if you dig in too impatiently you may pop it like a balloon! In either case, there may be a harmful, emotional outburst. You cannot, for example, just demand that employees be open with you or else!
This is why it is a good idea, especially in the weeks just following a major change, to start every meeting, group or individual, by inquiring how people feel, thereby allowing for a gradual decrease of pressure. In some cases, a skilled facilitator is recommended.
Getting employees to share their feelings is, however, another matter. Many of the feelings connected with grieving such as depression and anger are often taken as a sign of poor morale or a bad attitude. Employees may feel displaying or discussing them will open them up to the punishment of some kind or even put them on the next layoff list! The key is to be an empathetic, understanding listener whom employees feel they can trust with their feelings. Remember:
“People don’t care what you believe until they believe that you care!”
“Many a man would rather you hear his story than grant his request.”
As employees reach the final stages of beginnings, active acceptance of the changes replaces passive resignation. In this stage, employees need to become committed to the organisation’s vision of the future, take an active role in shaping its future, adopt new values and attitudes and see the past problems as opportunities to become even more effective and productive.
Once employees have a realistic picture of where the organisation is going, you can help them move into Beginnings by asking them what they want to get from the new situation. Their initial answer may be vague or concrete and it may have to do with new skills, responsibilities or development. But this starts them thinking in terms of opportunities, which change always brings. The fact is, once they get through a gut-wrenching experience of change, many employees report increased job satisfaction due to greater autonomy and a more interesting job!
While grumbling and venting often go together, it is essential to distinguish them:
Venting involves expressing feelings such as, “I’m really angry,” or “This whole thing leaves me confused.” Venting can help employees deal with change. Venting requires the expression of understanding and acceptance.
Grumbling involves complaining or criticizing while taking no responsibility for solutions. Example: “This is the stupidest idea I ever heard of.” Or, “This will never work.” The appropriate response to grumbling is to get the employee, or group, to express what the problem is and to partner with them in taking ownership for finding creative ways to achieve goals with limited resources.
The stage of Beginnings is often reached in very small steps. Perhaps, it is just having an employee go to lunch to meet someone from another department he or she will be working with on a newly formed task force. Don’t expect your employees to become empowered, risk-taking, entrepreneurial, high-involvement team players overnight.
This is good advice for leaders whose employees are learning a new task or function. It is especially important in helping employees overcome uncertainty about their ability to cope, adjust and continue to contribute to the organisation.
Again, fairly standard advice, but infrequently followed! Who feels that they get enough affirmation, praise and appreciation from their bosses? When employees are suffering from doubts about competence and self-worth, every step of progress merits a minor celebration. It will also be a boost for you to see them soak it up!
High-performance teams are increasingly the key to organisational success in today’s highly competitive economy. Teamwork means more than traditional “cooperativeness” and “lending a hand". It involves breaking out of a narrow, assembly-line view of one’s job and overcoming interdepartmental rivalries through cross-functional, interdisciplinary and multi-level teams. It also includes a much greater exercise of a host of interpersonal communication skills than in the past, on everyone’s part. Here you must truly lead by example!
Profit-sharing or gain-sharing may be outside your authority to implement, but many organisations are finding such approaches powerful motivators. If not available for you, consider suggesting them to your boss. Consider bonuses also. Special dinners or lunches to honour achievements, theatre tickets, dinner for two, a day off, casual dress days, etc. can temporarily increase morale. But, they may be less meaningful than in the past. After a significant change, employees may become more “bottom-line” oriented. They want to profit significantly from their contributions.
We are referring here to an informal “contract” or understanding. Formerly, the assumption was that if an employee is doing a good job and the organisation is doing well, that person can count on long-term if not lifetime job security, along with regular raises and promotions. This assumption no longer holds.
The so-called “new contract” is something like the following: “The employee is responsible for continually finding new ways to contribute to the organisation. The employer, in turn, is responsible for providing interesting and meaningful work and the opportunity for growth and development, so that, over time, the employee becomes more marketable, either within or outside the organisation. Pay will be equitable and competitive based upon the value-added. Whatever job security there may depend upon the success of the organisation and the employee’s ability to contribute in the future, not upon past contributions.
The extent to which this applies in your organisation must be clarified to employees.
This suggestion flows naturally from the preceding one. Employees can no longer expect the organization to plan for their futures in a paternalistic way.
When the current project is complete, their “contract” with the organization may be renewed or it may not be.