How to communicate to create a shared understanding of the vision or goals of the team your supervising.
In building a vision/goal, Stephen Covey’s Habit 2, “Begin with the end in mind”, also provides valuable ideas. According to Covey, to begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination.
Click here to view a video on Effective People Begin With The End in Mind.
It means to know where you are going so that you better understand where you are now and so that the steps you take are always in the right direction. The extent to which you begin with the end in mind often determines whether a business succeeds.
Assess which stage best describes your organisation now:
Telling: The “boss” knows what the vision/goal should be, and the organisation is going to have to follow it. The message: “We’ve got to do this. It’s our vision/goal. Be excited about it or reconsider your vision/goal for your career here.”
Selling: The “boss” knows what the vision/goal should be but needs the organisation to “buy-in” before proceeding. The message: “We have the best answer. Let us see if we can get you to buy in.”
Testing: The “boss” has an idea/s about what the vision/goal should be and wants to know the organisation’s reactions before proceeding. The message: “What excites you about this vision/goal? What doesn’t?”
Consulting: The “boss” is putting together a vision/goal and wants creative input from the organisation before proceeding. The message: “What vision/goal do members recommend that we adopt?”
Co-creating: The “boss” and members of the organisation build a shared vision/goal together, through a collaborative process. The message: “Let us create the future we individually and collectively want.”
“We’ve got to do this. It’s our vision/goal. Be excited about it or reconsider your vision/goal for your career here.”
People don’t get to vote. When the boss says, “this is the vision/goal of what the organisation is going to look like two years from now”, people know that if they disagree or if they are caught undermining the change, they jeopardise their career. “Telling” often takes place in a crisis, when the senior managers perceive that some drastic change is necessary.
Tips for mastering the “Telling” mode:
“We have the best answer. Let’s see if we can get you to buy in.”
The leader attempts to “enrol” people in the vision/goal, enlisting as much commitment as possible.
Tips for mastering the “Selling” mode:
“What excites you about this vision/goal? What doesn’t?”
The leader lays the vision/goal out for testing, not only to find out whether the members support the vision/goal, but how enthusiastically they will accept it and what aspects of it matter to them. Having been asked their opinion, people feel more compelled to discuss and consider the proposed vision/goal.
Tips for mastering the “Testing” mode:
“What vision/goal do members recommend that we adopt?”
Consulting is the preferred stage for a boss who recognises that he or she cannot possibly have all the answers – and who wants to make the vision/goal stronger by inviting the organisation to be the boss’s consultant.
Tips for mastering the “Consulting” mode:
The co-creating stage is obviously the ultimate way of creating a shared vision/goal. It can be achieved as follows:
Start with a personal vision/goal: When a shared vision/goal starts with personal vision/goal, the organisation becomes a tool for people’s self-realisation, rather than a machine they are subjected to. People begin to stop thinking of the organisation as a thing to which they are subservient. Only then can they wholeheartedly participate in guiding its direction.
Treat everyone as equal: Everybody has an equal say and an equal vote in what the vision/goal should be. Status differences should be discouraged altogether.
Seek alignment, not agreement: The temptation will be strong to paper over differences for the sake of reaching resolution and producing a coherent output. Teams should discourage this. Instead, they should use team learning practices such as skilful discussion and dialogue to look for the assumptions beneath the disagreement and see what mental models have led to this irreconcilable view.
Encourage interdependence and diversity among teams: When team members begin talking about their vision/goal, avoid telling them what other teams have said. Rather ask each team first: “What do we really want?” Once the team’s vision/goal has been articulated, then members who also belong to other teams can later serve as communicating agents. Over time, teams become curious about each other’s vision/goals and two or more teams may discover a strategic value in meeting together, comparing notes and creating a shared vision/goal in tandem.
Avoid “sampling”: Avoid talking only to a sample of people, due to time and financial constraints. Everybody must have an equal opportunity to express how they see the vision/goal for their part of the organisation.
Have people only speak for themselves: Participants should not be allowed to let their assumptions about how other people may react to their vision/goal interfere with the process. They should be honest in what they want and what they would like to see.
Expect and nurture reverence for each other: When a real diversity of opinions occurs in a group, a reverence for each other’s vision/goal will often take hold.
Consider using an “interim vision/goal” to build momentum: A brief, rough and intuitive vision/goal will give team members an initial point of reference. If it comes from higher in the hierarchy, do not distribute it in a memo. Refrain from revealing it right away at team meetings. Wait until the team members have started to get some clarity about their own vision/goal. Only then the interim vision/goal can be made available, which can then be aligned with what the team has in mind.
Focus on the dialogue, not just the vision/goal statement: Vision/goals often translate into vision/goal and purpose statements, which seem cryptic to outsiders, but have enormous meaning for the people who struggled to craft each word, so that everyone can sign off on them and feel the statement is meaningful. The process is more important than the product. Participants actively instil meaning and inspiration into the words and give them symbolic value. The words on its own mean nothing. That is why the test of a vision/goal is not in the statement, but in the directional force it gives the organisation.
Covey captures the essence of a deep shared vision/goal as follows: “…(it) creates a great unity and tremendous commitment. It creates in people’s hearts and minds a frame of reference, a set of criteria or guidelines by which they will govern themselves. They don’t need someone else directing, controlling, criticising or taking cheap shots. They have bought into the changeless core of what the organisation is about."